Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire
Well it doesn't. It's trying to claim King is going around trying to convince people that the Flames are a bottom 10 revenue team. What else would bottom feeder mean? Just shows the biases of the writer or editor.
|
It does, actually. You’re forgetting that what is common knowledge on here (that revenue-sharing receiver does not equal financially struggling), is not common knowledge to the average fan and certainly not to non-fans.
There’s no bias, why would there be? What does the writer care? The fact is that King was specifically trying to portray the Flames in a particular way using a fact that, in reference to their economic viability, is actually completely meaningless and stupid to bring up.
Also, try reading the article past the headline. It’s spot on.