Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion
Nothing like a bunch of so called Christians who openly admit that the version of the Bible that they follow has been altered by men to allow the re-enforcement of their interpretation of the scripture, lest anyone dare to disagree with their homophobic interpretations.
I guess I misunderstood the whole thing.
Don't Christians claim that the Bible is the word of God. How can that be true if they advocate going ahead and inserting the words of humans when they find the word of God to be less than they want.
Presumptuous bunch aren't they?
|
I think your being presumptuous. I use the King James version exclusively. Homosexuality wasn't even an issue when it was translated. It was actually more of an issue in the New Testament times. You have pointed out that that word(homosexualality) didn't even exist in the 16th century. You have not shown any evidence that this translation was altered because of a political agenda.