View Single Post
Old 11-13-2006, 03:52 PM   #170
Crazy Flamer
First Line Centre
 
Crazy Flamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kobasew fan View Post
Lets see now. Science has supposedly proven evolution. The purpose of this was to set out to prove that humans evolved from animals. How is this not biased. Scientists set out to prove a theory you are very likely to be biased.

As for religion correcting itself you are trying to compare apples and oranges here. Science is continuously conducting more experiments in order to prove or disprove a theory. Religion is based upon the Bible for example. The Bible is based on historical text.
I don't think scientists started out with a mission to prove that man came from animals. They just started collecting more and more evidence that pointed to the fact. Thus, a theory was born.

And the fact that science is continurously WILLING to correct itself makes my point about it being that much more objective. Many discoveries in science are in conflict with what religion teaches. The fact that Religion doesn't want to adapt because it is based on some historical text furthermore proves my point that its views are biased.
__________________
Bleeding the Flaming C!!!
Crazy Flamer is offline   Reply With Quote