Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Set the model to 2.5%
|
Have you run any scenarios where non-hockey related revenue rises above 30%?
It would be interesting to see the impact of the Flames increasing non-hockey revenue (year over year) by 10% (from 30% to 33% total) or 20% (to 36%) or even 25% (to 38.25%) on the bottom line. Heck, to be conservative you might leave the first year or two of the new arena at 30%, then 5 years assuming growth to 33%, another 5 years assuming growth to 36%, etc.
I'd like to see what that results in.