Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire
So, what's your point? No matter what decade it is, the fans will not support a mediocre hockey team with no hope for the future.  |
The point is that there is a salary cap now, as ownership has "cost-certainty".
Bringing up arguments from a different set of circumstances is as valid as bringing up arguments from a different sport on a different continent.
Winnipeg moved WITH a sweetheart deal from the province to cover losses.
They have a team now because of cost certainty, aka the salary cap, NOT because of a new arena. If it was because of a new arena, why is the arena undersized?