View Single Post
Old 11-13-2006, 03:48 PM   #168
Kobasew fan
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Flamer View Post
That is incorrect. A scientific organization trying to prove or disprove any theory has lot more credibility than a religious one. Why? Just because an organization is non-religious does not mean they are anti-religion or trying to disprove religious claims. That was an assumption you made incorrectly on your part.

Second of all, science has proven itself to be a lot more objective than religion. We always here of science correcting itself, disclaiming old scientific theories with knew knowledge. How often do you see religion correcting itself???...
Lets see now. Science has supposedly proven evolution. The purpose of this was to set out to prove that humans evolved from animals. How is this not biased. Scientists set out to prove a theory you are very likely to be biased.

As for religion correcting itself you are trying to compare apples and oranges here. Science is continuously conducting more experiments in order to prove or disprove a theory. Religion is based upon the Bible for example. The Bible is based on historical text.
Kobasew fan is offline   Reply With Quote