Quote:
Originally Posted by Kobasew fan
See therein lies the problem. If a non-religous organization is arguing against religion it also have a huge motivating factor to prove itself right. So based on your logic all sources arguing against religion should be dismissed as prejudicial.
Think about this. Who is going to argue that religion is true except for those who believe in a particular religion. It doesn't make sense to dismiss a religous website and not dismiss secular resources. Either you need to consider both or none at all.
|
That is incorrect. A scientific organization trying to prove or disprove any theory has lot more credibility than a religious one. Why? Just because an organization is non-religious does not mean they are anti-religion or trying to disprove religious claims. That was an assumption you made incorrectly on your part.
Second of all, science has proven itself to be a lot more objective than religion. We always here of science correcting itself, disclaiming old scientific theories with knew knowledge. How often do you see religion correcting itself???...
Yeah, didn't think so.