Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Flamer
When a Christian website displays information on its website that has to do with supporting its views, it can be largely dismissed because the the huge motivating factor to prove itself right. Bias exists and therefore, the information presented is prejudicial and can be self serving. The information does not come form an objective source.
|
See therein lies the problem. If a non-religous organization is arguing against religion it also have a huge motivating factor to prove itself right. So based on your logic all sources arguing against religion should be dismissed as prejudicial.
Think about this. Who is going to argue that religion is true except for those who believe in a particular religion. It doesn't make sense to dismiss a religous website and not dismiss secular resources. Either you need to consider both or none at all.