Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
Just because I said one deal was fair does not mean that I can't think other deals are fair as well. Believe it or not, the whole world doesn't ascribe to a single perspective or idea on what is fair. Some people can hold a very nuanced view where give and take on each side can provide a fair deal.
Rent to the tune of $275M dollars! Be accurate. There was nothing in the deal about the city picking up anything more than the $225 million, and it was meant to be all encompassing.
Is that really your position? Really? An you accuse me of trolling? The Flames presentation suggested they were fronting $275M in cash.
Is this about your ego and your poll having to be right or something? Because I can't believe anyone would really give a rip about someone else thinking that there are more than one way to skin a cat. Why do you care that I think both proposals have merit and could be the foundation for a deal? Is this more about you being right than the a deal being formulated that can work for all parties? Sure seems that way based on your attacks on me.
Says I can see the value of multiple positions and don't have to create a singular position and then brow beat people into agreeing with it. You might want to look into that. There are many ways to any solution, not just a single one.
|
I pointed out you said 1/3 of City funding was fair who then turned around and said 52% was also fair.
If you see pointing out that inconsistency is an attack, I don't know what to say.
Not to mention that we've learned the Flames aren't fronting anything like $275 million.
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk