Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
Interesting details in there that the Flames did not release about their cash contribution. That turns the tide somewhat. The Flames need to step up more in that regard and secure a greater deal of the financing itself. I don't like the expectation of the City having to carry the ticket tax, although that is the only way it could be done, since the Flames can't impose a tax. I don't like the City slushing in all the stuff in regards to the Saddledome, as its their building and they should pay for costs associated with its destruction or repurposing. Little bits that are important and need to be addressed.
|
I think if the CSEC has stipulated that the Saddledome must be demolished due to a non-compete clause, then it absolutely becomes a contribution from the City.
Otherwise if we're okay with having two arenas and the City chooses to demolish the Saddledome for planning or their own reasons, then it shouldn't go into the calculation.