was working earlier, seems to be down now.
basically they refute the cities 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 and say they are paying for 100% of it
they say their proposal is a 50/50 split. The CRL will cover the cities portion.
they spend 1/3 of the page describing how they generate 485mill/yr for the city (indirectly through businesses like restaurants and cabs) and how they (indirectly again) employ 5,500 people. I basically closed the browser after that, as those 'indirect businesses' = our contribution to the city argument is so wrong to me, my rage was rising too high.
as has been stated, they left a lot of math out and it was a really terrible counter argument, just based on the fact you can see them lying. They may have good points or another way to look at things, but when you lie or lie by omission, the rest of the points get skimmed over because you don't trust the source.
|