If you call a ticket tax an opportunity cost to the Flames in that the Flames are not able to price their tickets higher and maximize revenues, then the city land contribution has to be considered an opportunity cost as well. That land could be sold to someone.
Typically CRL would be used to fund infrastructure upgrades in the CRL area, would it not? Not to subsidize an anchor tenant.
__________________
Who is in charge of this product and why haven't they been fired yet?
|