I don't buy that. Being an ##### was the genius for winners like Evil Dick and Will Kerby and thankfully those juries were smart enough to separate their emotional feelings when determining who was the best game player. This season's jury was an embarrassment right down to the constant bickering all the way to the end.
I don't understand why people are angry at Paul especially when he didn't play a mean spirited game suck as Dick and Will. IMO he played one of the best games ever when you consider he essentially ran nearly every HOH and never went on the block. It wasn't as stealth as Derrick but I don't think Derrick could play that same game a 2nd time in the house and Paul was returning and had to change up his game. It's obvious by comments here that some of don't like him and it's clouded your minds as saying Paul wasn't deserving is simply ignorant. Outside of his jury management I haven't heard a single argument that can back that he wasn't the best player by a long shot. I don't always like the people but I respect the best players and that's why I feel the finale was a sham.
Last edited by Erick Estrada; 09-21-2017 at 07:28 AM.
|