Quote:
Originally Posted by calf
Why?
|
Because of the intangible benefits of a new rink? Because of the increased interest for developers in assisting with getting the City's vision of the area accomplished? Because maybe that lower number could be recouped from higher property taxes in the area? Because they said they wanted a new arena there?
If it's a "no public money" position you want to take, why even enter into the debate? It's a fair position, but leaves nothing for negotiation.
I sure don't mind the City spending some money on it, on a non-repaid basis. And I sure don't want them paying for the whole thing. If you get to that point, then you can actually have a negotiation.