Quote:
Originally Posted by Par
The City own the Saadledome, so including demolition cost is just bogus(the Saddledome is the responsibility of city.) So they should be responsible for the demolition costs anyways.
|
It's not bogus if the Flames are insisting on it as a precondition to the deal. I'd agree with you otherwise but if the City had plans for the Saddledome post-Flames occupancy then they shouldn't be forced to demolish it without compensation. Maybe there's some wiggle room on the $$ amount.