[Flame On]

Why are the indirect costs being included? Is that part of the City's 1/3?

I mean the city wants an entertainment district there, and presumably any 17th ave. extensions and green line station and infrastructure improvements, they'd have to do anyway, so they're passing that off to the Flames part of the deal and then saying "hey look at this as part of the Flames invoice and by the way we want all that money back as part of property tax reimbursement"?

Or am I getting that wrong or something??