Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
|
Fair to who? The billionaires that have enough pocket change laying around for a few arenas?
In this economic climate, one party is at a pretty large advantage. And they're the ones poised to reap the benefits of the new arena for years to come, as it will also increase the value of the club.
52% from the city is steep. And one third from the city could be viewed as a touch lean as well. Somewhere in the middle is probably the what's actually "fair". And that includes the city slowly recouping some of that over a number of years. But these rich ass owners should be fronting at least half. They won't suffer either way, whether they pay half of the entire thing.