Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
people can CHOOSE to use anything the city builds or not.
If they cannot afford it, then they CHOOSE not to...pretty simple eh?
Like tomorrow...you can go down to the dome and watch all the players for 6 hours worth of practices.
You know what it will cost?
Nothing.
As for your relentless observation about billionaires...yeah no kidding guys that own NHL teams have money. Who else would own them? We get it, you hate capitalism and anyone who has made a lot of money. Move on.
|
You are a bitter, bitter man. Always ready to name call.
So I hate capitalism and anyone who has made a lot of money?
Quote:
Originally Posted by longsuffering
I'll go on record with my bottom line.
The City provides the site and upgrades the infrastructure in the area - the same type as proposed in Nenshi's video - at their cost.
The City provides a cash grant of $100 million of the construction costs. I could also live with the City providing more initial funding as long as any contributions >$100 million are returned to the City via a revenue sharing mechanism.
ErikEstrada, transplant, New Era, ManhattanBoy, et al. What's your bottom line?
|
Are you going to share your bottom line view on what an acceptable deal is?