Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
Any sale will have the conditions agreed to long before it gets to the BoG. Pay attention bro.
|
Yes, I know. They will be blocked.
Quote:
Dramatics? Asking you questions you refuse to answer is dramatics? Sure thing bro.
Seattle will be a relocation site. During the last round of expansion talks Seattle showed interest, but the group elected to not submit the $10M application fee. Coupled with the cost of the renovation of the building, and the primary target of a NBA team, the NHL team will have to be from some team experiencing problems.
I also wouldn't be betting on your bro Brett Wilson riding to the rescue anytime soon. Wilson has been hyper critical of Nenshi and city council, so I doubt he has the appetite to get involved with them in trying to negotiate an arena deal, not after the current owners gained little traction.
|
Did I avoid your questions, or did I say yes? Don't get all pissy and go on your typical New Era wall of text unreadable posts because you missed where I said yes.
Seattle might be a relocation site but it would be a failing franchise, not a overwhelmingly successful one; arena issue or not.
Brett Wilson was one example, he tried to buy into the group into the past and I know there are plenty of others who've tried to get into Flames ownership. It really wouldn't be a problem.
All that being said this is all posturing and I'm shocked some are falling for it hook line and sinker. There has been zero indication any of the Flames owners are looking to sell. Even if one billionaire is out, that doesn't mean all are.