Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Well then brace yourself!
If the city gets to decide location, grandeur and cost they clearly need to be a bigger stake holder in it.
Why would a private company give up complete control in a project and then pay 100% of the costs?
And the Edmonton model is what it is. It's recent, it's nearby, it fits into the same industry ... of course they're going to refer to it. You would too.
|
Where does the company lose complete control in this? They lose choice of location, but the land is free.