View Single Post
Old 08-30-2017, 04:48 PM   #595
Fozzie_DeBear
Wucka Wocka Wacka
 
Fozzie_DeBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: East of the Rockies, West of the Rest
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
The difference is if a driver swerves to avoid an oncoming truck and runs over a pedestrian, we take into account the state of stress the driver is in, his lack of awareness of what's around him 360 degrees, and the split-second nature of the decision he has to make. A driver in that situation will rarely be found at fault.

But a car programmed to swerve away from an oncoming truck onto a sidewalk with pedestrians is an entirely different kettle of fish. At some point, the designers of the software have to come up with procedures that rely on valuating probabilities against lives.

I'm not saying it's in insurmountable problem. But I wouldn't be surprised if the legislative/ethical/liability issues take as long to hash out as the technology. So if we're 10 years away technologically, we're at least 20 years away from a regulatory and legal framework.
20 years? No way it takes that long...

Who would be liable in a situation where a car is using cruise control and gets into an accident?
__________________
"WHAT HAVE WE EVER DONE TO DESERVE THIS??? WHAT IS WRONG WITH US????" -Oiler Fan

"It was a debacle of monumental proportions." -MacT
Fozzie_DeBear is offline   Reply With Quote