View Single Post
Old 08-29-2017, 10:33 AM   #52
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
You can be forceful on the AHL contract without pushing hard for a minimum NHL deal.

I would be very disappointed if the team would let $175k stand between icing the best team possible. The bottom pairing and 4th line can easily make the difference between winning and losing. Why else would the Flames already be spending so much money on those positions?

I'd be disappointed if signing Jagr or other decisions force the team to lose all flexibility in assembling the best roster.
Your concern to me is only valid if you think the Flames will add a guy that they believe won't make them better.

Can't see the logic in that.

Can certainly make an argument that you think said player won't help them, but to assume they will sign say Jagr even though they don't see him doing much thus screwing a 6th defenseman into a season in the AHL in order to keep a lesser player.

This is a case of the team and the player working on a roster fit that should see his NHL time go up because a limitation is removed.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote