Quote:
Originally Posted by Frequitude
No one is trying to use "not fair" as a valid legal argument.
The general consensus in here seems to be either:
a) The residents don't have any legal argument here so tough luck for them, or
b) The residents don't have any legal argument here but it was poor form (i.e. not fair) for the city to promise them an alternative and then withdraw it.
|
If the argument is really down to "tough luck" or "poor form", there isn't much to talk about. I thought the issue was whether the city should (further) compensate. I don't think poor form comes close to that.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|