Quote:
Originally Posted by longsuffering
You never address the difficult questions but I'll ask them anyway.
Addressing your last paragraph, was any effort made to hire a lawyer on a contingency basis? Contingency cases are quite commonplace these days.
Furthermore, of the banks who allegedly lent money against the City's so-called guarantee that a new park will be built, why have none of them taken action against the City? Banks aren't known to shy away from protecting their legal interests.
.
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
|
I could be wrong but I don't think the bank would start anything now until a loan was actually defaulted on. And I think the onus would still be on the resident regardless. So if it is defaulted the banks wouldn't go after the city but after whoever took the loan out.