Quote:
Originally Posted by northcrunk
hahaha maybe from the outside looking in but the city has not treated them with empathy at all. I guess spending $500,000 on a stupid ugly statue is more important than not destroying citizens lives.
|
They have been treated fairly. If they had a legal case based of the supposed promise from the city, it would have been resolved in their favour by now. If the city was in contravention of the Mobile Homes Sites Act, then they would have been forced to change their approach.
Since no one can actually show the city is breaching a contract or the Act, it's pretty safe to say that no factual argument exists and the argument is solely based on emotion and an expectation of special treatment.
It boils down to a tenancy dispute where the tenant has no factual basis for their claims.