Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Fair enough, but you're still asking low income residents to find a way to ante up $55,000.00 per pad to do that. or add about $5000.00 per year to their bottom line living expenses.
Of course its going to be rejected, and I don't doubt that the city knew it would be rejected before they presented it.
|
So the city should just give away the land? Or pay for the $7m fix to be a slumlord? I'm missing the argument you're making, since I think you're agreeing any sort of purchase by tenants isn't feasible, the city has a right to evict and do something better with their land.