Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
If they hadn't been paying property taxes, then they would have paid more for their lot fees to cover it, just like anyone who rents a home, condo, etc. One way or another, they would have paid. Your arguments, like the pipes below their trailers, don't hold much water.
|
You're right. But these people also pay lot fees which do cover the property taxes on the land....they do in every other privately owned park in the city so it's reasonable to assume they do here as well. Add that to the property tax the people pay on their homes and you have something along the line of what everyone else in the city pays. And yet they do not get the same level of service. Have they been receiving discounted lot fees is the question. In the past they've been in line with the other parks in the city.