Quote:
Originally Posted by northcrunk
My sister and brother in law will be on facebook live with Danielle smith at 2pm to talk about the situation. They only purchased their home there because of the cities assurance to move into east hills. They didn't mind the park was moving and have letters from the city stating the land was bought and plans were in place.
|
Did they talk to a lawyer during the purchase process or after about the supposed assurance from the city? Seems like it would be an easy thing to clear up and if it was binding, the city could be held to it.
It sounds more like a "this is the current plan" letter and the plan changed, not an actual guarantee that can be enforced
I'm not really expecting an answer from you though, it's been asked twice here and on Reddit as well, but the question is always conveniently "missed"