[PepsiFree]

Originally Posted by Flames in 07

Ok. Exactly what catagorization?

As I said, that Antifa and Nazis are even remotely categorically similar, to the point that it would be logical to mention them both in the same breath:

Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch

In this case you have to debate the ethical view that AntiFa and Neo-Nazi's crave confrontational violence. So yes to me both sides aren't exactly Moral in that sense.

Originally Posted by DiracSpike

Then we wouldn't have to rely on a communist anarchist group with only a slightly better history of violence than Nazis to be the neutral arbiters of law and order.

Originally Posted by RichKlit

Just because they are the lesser of 2 evils in this instance does not legitimize them.

Originally Posted by 2Stonedbirds

We need anitifa about as much as we need nazis. They just prefer a different brand of totalitarianism.

Comments like these are, at the most generous interpretation, sort of accidentally ignorant sounding and flippant. At the worst interpretation, they're Nazi apologists. That's area nobody in their right mind wants to tread close to and I don't believe anyone of these posts intentionally does that, but the main issue is that this distinction is left to interpretation.

Antifa = morally right intentions that anyone in a modern liberal society can relate to (racism, bigotry, hate = bad) with methods few in that same society can relate to or morally condone (violence, suppression of free speech)

Nazi = morally wrong intentions and methodology that literally no even debatably good person in their right mind can relate to.

There's no slippery slope here.