Pronman's lists, regardless of what they are, are always quite different. Much like Button, he doesn't try to re-create lists that are reflective of widely held views. His views are his own and he stands by them.
I value that - because it provides different POVs as opposed to just reading countless columns that repeat the same thing.
However, overall, I also find his player evaluations to be uneven and favoring certain types of players and where those players are sourced. So I tend to find his stuff interesting but I don't trust him much as an evaluator, however admire that he somehow positioned himself as a trusted expert by someone like ESPN.
|