Quote:
Originally Posted by Displaced Flames fan
So peace negotiations are not a possible response? In your eyes, the Palestinians must continue to blow up busses full of women and children until the Israelis abandon their country?
|
ummm.... no.
but weh npeople are chased from their homes by violence there's typically only one response, violence.
it's not 'right' but neither was resettling them in the first place.
and yes, i know, the <standard defending israel response # 53> to that is saying that:
'the arabs' signed this agreement
or 'the arabs' pledged to resettle the palestinian arabs on their times and dime.
browbeating a british puppet king, young feisal, into signing an agreement that he himself didn't have to do a damn thing to honour, is total hogwash.
weizmann and his modern supporters as well as balfour and his modern apologists should be ashamed of themselves.
british foreign ministry creates a new arab kingship unilaterally and appoints one arab to speak for all of them, and then they lean on him to sign a piece of paper granting palestine to zionist interests.
the FACT is, that the arabs living in palestine were never consulted on any of this, and the deeds to the land purcased from ottoman landowners in riyadh, istanbul, and damascus should have died with that sick and bloated empire.