Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminaughty
BS You are like the #1 peddler of this Russia narrative and likely in the top 3 most active in this thread. Oh there's plenty of smoke is there?????? Now don't you sound like a bit of a conspiracy theorist.
|
Actually that works the other way, conspiracy theorists work to sound like normal people.
The difference is no one is investigating Clinton for murdering Seth Rich. No one reasonably looks at any of the "evidence" and thinks "there's something worth checking out there". Because the "evidence" is all wishful thinking and unanswered questions and "connections" and logical fallacies.
The Russia "narrative" on the other hand has actual events that prompt further investigation. People that have worked on previous campaigns, from Obama to Bushes to Clintons have all said the amount of attention and interaction with Russia that is known about was without president. People from the campaign failed to disclose many meetings with Russians, repeatedly. Some lied to Congress about it. Some lied to the FBI about it. Some were fired for it, some had to recuse themselves from matters related to it. The campaign openly admits attempting to establish communication via secured Russian channels (again without president). The campaign openly admits to attempting to gain advantage with the help of the Russian government. And more. The House, the Senate and the FBI all saw enough to warrant inclusion of Trump campaign activities in their respective investigations into Russia's actions in trying to influence the election.
The only guy investigating the conspiracy theories are guys with guns arrested and jailed for shooting in a pizza place. The only people who think Clinton sold uranium to Russia are those who want to think it so avoid learning any more about it.
But because you have your conclusions already, based on what you want to think and the "evidence" cooked up by The_Donald (omg this guy appears in a photo with that guy, he must be related to the murder!!), you see posting new information as "peddling".
But go ahead, quote me where I've made a conclusion. You can't because I haven't. I've made my prediction, and that doesn't include Trump knowingly colluding himself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminaughty
Well let's see how this investigation goes..... I know what outcome you are clearly fishing for.
|
That you think you can fish for a conclusion just exposes the "reasoning" process behind "Clinton brokered a uranium sale" conclusions.
I'm hoping for a conclusion that will reduce or remove Trump's power and influence, but what I hope for doesn't matter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminaughty
Who knows what happened with Seth Rich.
|
Could have been a botched robbery. Could have been Clinton. Could have been a heart attack induced by a Podesta satanic ritual. All possibilities must be considered.