Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminaughty
But if the roles were reversed and Hillary was president, would you be tooting the same horn? There's also a ton of smoke with the Clintons and all of their shady dealings, but that get's overlooked for some reason.
She couldn't even fairly beat a 74 year old socialist for the party designation. The hypocrisy is thick!
|
Yes, if the roles were reversed and Hillary was president and was in bed with the Russians as much as Trump seems like he might have been/might be, they should be looking at her first.
One is the current president, one is not. The one who is running the country should be looked at now, not later.
Not sure what the problem is. If he's innocent then what's the issue?