Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz
Well the more players getting "lock out bonuses" the morel likely you will see a longer lockout. I am not sure if you were meaning the opposite or if I am confused.
|
I don't imagine 31 ownership groups will be overly thrilled to be paying what could easily be north of $150M - $200M collectively to players that are not playing.
I don't see how having one or two players per team with this perk has any bearing on what the rest of the NHLPA would be doing....way too small of the voting percentage to matter to that side of the coin.