Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus
If this is lock-out protection, why would the team agree to these terms? If my understanding is correct, they would still be owed said bonus if the season is wiped out that year....seems silly to give that type of concession.
|
Because it was a negotiation that takes both parties to agree to. Monahan and Gaudreau fought for the lockout protection contracts, probably conceding something else until both parties were happy to have the contracts signed. That's how contracts work.
It's a gamble for the Flames (and every team handing out these contracts) but it's become pretty much the norm for big name players. It could create an interesting dynamic as the "haves" of the NHLPA will still be making bank if there's a lockout while a lot of the lesser players will want to get the negotiations going so they can get some actual cash. Similarly, teams with a lot of money set up in these "lockout contracts" will be hoping to get the ball rolling as they will still be paying millions to players not playing, while teams not doing so may be a little bit less inclined.