Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulu29
I dunno Rube, all I'm asking for is due process, I do believe that evidence exists that could lead to Khadr facing charges. Would he be convicted? I dunno, but I think the crown should have taken a look at it. Clearly they aren't so it's all redundant. And no, I'm not a fiscal conservative or conservative of any sort.
|
But this is due process. The Crown decides whether cases are worth prosecuting/litigating on a regular basis. I just don't understand the reasoning that goes into thinking the government didn't follow due process in this particular case. They stood to gain absolutely nothing by rushing this through and not tying it up in the courts further.