Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
This is out of genuine curiousity, because I don't actually know if there's a statement out there saying they didn't, but (if not) what makes you think they didn't take a look at it?
Couldn't they have taken a look at the potential charges, the evidence available, and the likely outcome and decide that it wasn't beneficial in any way to pursue it?
|
I guess I'm looking at it through a different lens. Clearly he was abused, tortured, tormented in Gitmo. I would gather that's undisputed. Were charges considered? That's something I'd like to know but it hasn't been stated. I really feel that saying charges were considered but not recommended would dump cod water on the fire. My 2 cents