Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulu29
I dunno Rube, all I'm asking for is due process, I do believe that evidence exists that could lead to Khadr facing charges. Would he be convicted? I dunno, but I think the crown should have taken a look at it. Clearly they aren't so it's all redundant. And no, I'm not a fiscal conservative or conservative of any sort.
|
This is out of genuine curiousity, because I don't actually know if there's a statement out there saying they didn't, but (if not) what makes you think they didn't take a look at it?
Couldn't they have taken a look at the potential charges, the evidence available, and the likely outcome and decide that it wasn't beneficial in any way to pursue it?