Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG!WTF!
There's a pretty key bit of information you're missing because you didn't read the report. All of your desire to prosecute for treason is conditional upon proving the charges against him were true. Or rather, provable. "provided the allegations by the US are true" is the exact wording.
And if you read the link I posted earlier you'd see the real evidence says he didn't throw the grenade. And you have no idea where the bombs he made were used.
But as long as you don't have to think about anything right?
|
I don't understand this. Proving what charges against him were true? Maybe I'm missing something...
You are suggesting he wasn't actively 'at war' with the coalition that Canada was part of? Are you suggesting the bombs he was making were for Canadian forces?
No idea if Khadr would have been found guilty, but that would have been the right action. Bring him home and charge him with treason.