Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Direct quote from the interview:
Rempel: "This is a very serious situation all around. Our Supreme Court has said his rights have been violated. To me as a legislator, I want the judiciary to make a decision on this."
Downright Stupefying.
|
I know these things are difficult for you to comprehend, but she clearly means she would have preferred the civil proceedings brought to their ultimate conclusion rather than settling - in line with the Conservative position on this issue. This is an entirely different judicial process than the SCC decision rendered in 2010.
Obviously the SCC decision serves as a precedent, which is why I agree with the decision to settle.