Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
The Flames JUST acquired a new, better top four defenseman AND signed Michael Stone to a long term deal all but assuring that he would regularly be relegated to the bottom pairing. Why the hell would anyone think that the Flames WANT Stone to play in the top-four, when they practically ensured that he wouldn't with the acquisition of Hamonic? If the Flames wanted Stone to play in the top-four, why did they not simply extend him and be done with it?
|
Simple, he needed a way to rationalize his proposal.
But it would need to happen now to make sense.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
|