Boy, the article (and some of the comments to it) are so uninformed. Like the author thinking Calgary would like to play Stone as a top 4. Or saying that a left side with Gio, Brodie, and then a choice of Kulak/Kylington/Wotherspoon is weak. Or saying that, because Calgary is strong on the right and not so much on the left, they should deplete the right more (thus making a weaker second pair and a much weaker bottom pairing). Or saying Calgary needs help up front (true) but then suggesting a 3C and a 3LW (false).
Like a commenter getting Brodie's shooting and former side backwards. Or thinking Burke would be doing the trade. Like revisiting the "difficult to get along with" fallacy.
Bad, bad article.
|