Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus
Your definition of a soldier is different than mine, He was involved in terrorism not war, reports are he was shot pointing a pistol at American soldiers after the dust cleared from his apparent grenade throwing exercise. Either which way he was there, his dad was a known terrorist and where there's smoke there's usually fire.
The Americans held and possibly tortured him because they felt he killed one of there's, do you really think they would let him go if Canada asked them too? Why didn't he sue the USA if he was innocent? They were the ones that did the torturing.
Anyway, I know I'm in a loosing battle here, it's the same every time with you when the muslim world is involved, guilty or not, it just doesn't matter
|
Why isn't he a solider? This is what I don't understand from those opposed to this settlement. It's all based around him killing an innocent father in an act of terrorism. Why is the US invading a foreign country bombing them soldiers and the people that they are killing terrorists?
Do you have links to the statements that he was holding a pistol when shot. My understanding was he was shot in the back but there are 3/4 different accounts as to what happened. I haven't seen one where he was armed when shot.