View Single Post
Old 07-08-2017, 07:06 PM   #1192
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamenfame View Post
35 year old goalie with a .913 career Sp 2.70 gaa career and a losing record is a waste of time . And people are day dreaming if they think he has any upside to his game. Fans will want to run him out of town by December mark this post.
Since you don't want to read the thread, here are some highlights:

@DarrenWHaynes
Many say ES SV% is a better indicator of a goalie's ability. Of 52 goalies with >40 starts the last 2 seasons, Mike Smith ranks 11th (.927).


Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Mike Smith faced on average:

34.38 shots against per game last season
15.10 were low danger (Saved 98.01% vs. League Avg of 97.91%)
10.83 were medium danger (Saved 92.61% vs. League Avg of 92.50%)
8.45 were high danger (Saved 83.73% vs. League Avg of 81.17%)

Brian Elliott faced on average:

27.81 shots against per game last season
13.01 were low danger (Saved 97.82% vs. League Avg of 97.91%)
8.28 were medium danger (Saved 93.84% vs. League Avg of 92.50%)
6.52 were high danger (Saved 79.13% vs. League Avg of 81.17%)




Now that's finalized, I expanded on the above numbers.

Smith was above league average in all three categories, while facing more shots per game than any other goalie
Smith was better than Elliott in high danger and low danger save %
Elliott was below league average in high danger and low danger save%
@Fan960Steinberg
Interesting Smith splits:
Career vs. Edm: 15-3-1, 0.924 SV%
Career vs. SJ: 12-8-3, 0.942 SV%
Career vs. LA: 15-8-1, 0.931 SV%
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post: