Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
No. I know it's not technically retired, but no one should wear #2 for the Flames again.
Kulak wore #3 in junior and Hamonik was apparently told he couldn't have #3. If Kulak switches, that will probably be it.
|
Where did you hear that? seems pretty odd to tell an established vet he can't have a number that an unproven rookie might want. I realize your not saying it's being held for Kulak but that's being implied by your comment