Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
Kulak was also out there, wearing the number 2. Now, I know it's just his Stockton number, but wouldn't it be awesome if he switched?
|
No. I know it's not technically retired, but no one should wear #2 for the Flames again.
Kulak wore #3 in junior and Hamonik was apparently told he couldn't have #3. If Kulak switches, that will probably be it.