You'd be wrong, and you've now put words in my mouth rather than attempt to defend your point. You haven't identified a "problem", you've just said "hey, see, gender is connected to biology". I'm aware that there are crazy people who deny that there's any link between the two, but no one here has done so. And sure, there's no reason to think it's impossible to develop technology that could alter any number of genetic markers in utero, and thereby change the characteristics of the person who emerges from the womb. Stop trying to change the subject.
You're arguing against straw men while refusing to answer the simple question that was posed to you: why is having a gender identity that differs from your biological sex a defect? What is it about this state of being that is bad and in need of "curing", as you've repeatedly suggested it is? You said it was a birth defect. Asking you to explain why you believe what you say you believe is not a "word game".
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|