Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
I agree with everything else you are saying, but a coach's job is to win hockey games. It is not to endear the fan base to a specific player, nor is it to ensure that the cap structure of the roster remains intact. Playing Draiaitl on McDavid's wing was never a "problem," it was a solution to an issue caused by a lack of depth.
As it so happened Draisaitl proved to be the best winger on the roster, and the only one who was consistently effective with McDavid on the top line. This was much more important at the time than developing balance on the second line for the future, but it ultimately shows with resonating clarity that Edmonton is no good.
|
I'd argue that McDavid is good enough to play with basically anyone and put up points.
McDavid was just as good with or without Draisaitl. Draisaitl was bad without McDavid and a superstar with him.
McDavid and Draisaitl together - Oilers scored 59.4% of goals scored while on the ice
McDavid without Draisaitl - Oilers scored 65.5% of goals scored while on the ice
Draisaitl without McDavid - Oilers scored 44.2% of goals scored while on the ice
One of those is not like the other.
https://puckalytics.com/#/SuperWOWY?...1315&pid2=1993
Draisaitl was good in the playoffs without McDavid scoring but that was driven by an insane shooting percentage. In terms of Corsi they were both bad without each other in the playoffs.