Stone was a notably better #4D in his few months than Wideman and Engelland (better 3rd pair guy) were. As was the consensus here and around the team.
So now that he is a #5, which is even more favorable, how are these other unwanted journeymen UFAs far better options to posters above? I don't understand.
Aside from after his injury where he likely wasn't fully healed, I thought he was great and loved his big shot from the point. And that was in a #4 role...
Don't understand people trashing this. You're setting yourself up for disaster by playing a ####ing pairing of Wotherspoon and Kulak (who are debatably even ready for a full NHL season) and then you have an injury to, say, Gio...
I look forward the people down on this eating much crow next season.
|