Ah, got it.
Stone just shouldn't impact on whether you keep Hamonic or Brodie, he's in a totally different category. 3.5M is probably too much to pay for Stone. 3 or less could be stomached but it still wouldn't be a great deal or anything.
I think people here overrate him. He gives up a lot of shots. You don't lose much by putting Kulak in instead and that money is better spent up front.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|